Thanks to EE Cycle Works I found myself with access to some crank testing equipment and couldn't pass up the opportunity to see for myself some of the differences in some of the boutique cranksets.
So on to the review. These are the cranks we'll be looking at for part 3 of this review, in alphabetical order (sorry a couple of pics didn't turn out so I'm using stock pics for Zipp and Tune.
1. Campag Record UT
2. Easton EC90
3. EE
4. Extralite QRC
5. FSA K-Force Light
6. FSA SLK-Light
7. Kcnc Ktype
8. Lightning SL and HD
9. PMP MicroII
10. Shimano Dura Ace
11. Sram Red
12. Storck Powerarm SL
13. Stronglight Fission
14. Stronglight X-wing
15. Thm Clavicula
16. Tune Fast Foot 6pack
17. Vista Integral
18. Zipp Vuma quad
A couple of notes on how the deflection testing was done. Each arm was preloaded with 50lbs. From there another 200 lbs was added and the difference was measured in inches. Each arm was tested twice and an average of those two measurements is what I will post. A lower number represents a stiffer crank. These will be labeled as Deflection-D(Drive side deflection) and Deflection-ND(non-drive side deflection)
We also tested the amount of of deflection in the chainrings by the loading of each arm. This isn't all that useful of a measurement unless you are having problems with front derailleur clearance issues. Typically these numbers were quite small. Labeled as Lateral-D
PLEASE NOTE:We have changed the way the SxW is calculated which we think simplifies things and creates more equality between stiffness and weight. In the past reviews we used left deflection x right deflection x weight. We have now corrected all of those to reflect the new method which is simply average deflection x weight.
NOTE #2We have now added a corrected weight to even the comparison in weight of sets. All corrected weights are complete with BB and using TA rings. In some cases we mounted a set of TA rings, in other cases we weighed the stock rings and corrected the total to represent the TA set of rings. We feel this gives a more even comparison of differences in the cranks and less of that in the rings. TA rings are available for almost every crank in this test with the exception of 2(XWing and Zipp)
Now on to the test.
-----------------------------------
Campagnolo Record Ultra Torque
Claimed Weight: 690grams w/bb
Stock Weight: 702grams w/bb
Corrected Weight: 683grams
Q-factor: 145mm
Spindle: 24.85mm
Deflection-D: 0.163
Deflection-ND: 0.279
Average Deflection: 0.22
SxW:150.26
Lateral-D: 0.012
Likes: Aesthetics, it's a very simple and clean looking crank. Looks good on almost any bike. Has a respectable weight, and very good stiffness making it one of the best SxWs that we tested. Q-factor is 2nd narrowest in the test which is great for most people. The rings shift quality and durability is also near the top of the charts. All in all a great crank.
Dislikes: Setup. The design requires tight frame tolerances, it's often not a plug and play kind of crank and is known to have issues with creaking noises. Also the proprietary bcd on the compact seems a bit annoying, however I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt in thinking that the compact gained something from the odd length 5th arm. The chainring bolts that are ridiculously priced are well beyond explanation(it's just plain gouging). Also since a very high torque is required to attach the two arms it would be nice if it were a bit easier to find the proper torque wrench attachment(for the price of these cranks the tool should be included.)
-------------------------------
Easton EC90
Claimed Weight: 663grams
Stock Weight: 671.3grams complete
Corrected Weight: 659grams
Q-factor: 146mm
Spindle: 23.98mm
Deflection-D: 0.200
Deflection-ND: 0.352
Average Deflection: 0.28
SxW: 184.52
Lateral-D: 0.011
Likes: A nice all around crank. Very easy installation. Shifts well and has a decent q-factor. I also liked that the chainring bolts used were allen key backed on a torx front. I like that the non-drive arm obscures the bearing cup by fairing it. I also like the raw fuctional look of the UD carbon. Ceramic bb option is reasonably priced.
Dislikes: The graphics and pedal insert. For some reason those two aspects give the crank a cheapish look. I also can't understand why someone taking this long to get into the crank market would go with the 24mm spindle rather than a larger spindle. The only reason I can think of for this is that they choose to target the oem module market over building a better crank.
-------------------------------
EE Proto
Weight: 669.2grams w/bb and Dura Ace rings
Corrected Weight: 629
Q-factor: 142mm
Spindle: 29.82mm
Deflection-D: 0.144
Deflection-ND: 0.225
Average Deflection: 0.18
SxW: 116.05
Lateral-D: 0.005
Note: I didn't plan on including this in the test as I only wanted cranks that I could put miles on and have some real world feedback on. It turns out that this is an older prototype and there is already a version after this one, that meant that this one was available for me to use for testing. Please note this crank will not be available for sale I'm including it just for fun.
Likes: In terms of technical function, this is the best balance I've seen yet in a crank. Low weight, high stiffness, very narrow q-factor, fantastic shifting(with DA rings). Having this has only made me hope that they decide to one day put a crank into production again. I also liked how the bearings were retained in the cups with clips making a bearing change much easier than on all the other outboard setups.
Dislikes: Gold, though I suspect there are alternate hardcoats that can be used in other colors. The other complaint I'd have with this as a production crank is that the left and right bearings have different IDs. This is accomplished by a very thin ti shim between a bearing and spindle. Similar to how THM has done it, but in this case it's not bonded to the spindle. It's possible this could lead to creaking issues, but I don't know that is true, nor did I have any noise issues.
-------------------------------
Extralite QRC
Claimed weight: 485grams no rings
Stock weight: 484grams no rings
Weight: 615grams w/bb and TA chainrings
Q-factor:138mm
Spindle: 21.75mm
Deflection-D: 0.206
Deflection-ND: 0.513
Average Deflection: 0.36
SxW: 221.09
Lateral-D: 0.016
Likes: Weight. A really good weight particularly for an alloy crank(3rd lightest tested, beaten only by Zipp and Thm) I absolutely love the 138mm Q-factor. This is one of very few integrated cranks that give you the ability to adjust the preload on the bearings, another great feature. Far narrower than any other crank. Looks are good, setup is quite easy and the bearings run smooth and long. All in all the ideas and execution are top notch.
Dislikes: I don't like that it is only available in compact. I also would love to see it a bit stiffer. I'd gladly trade a few grams to increase the bb diameter which should stiffen the crank quite a bit.
------------------------------
FSA K-force Light
Claimed weight: 660grams
Stock Weight: 721grams w/bb
Corrected Weight: 687grams
Q-factor: 147mm
Spindle: 23.68mm
Deflection-D: 0.164
Deflection-ND: 0.309
Average Deflection: 0.24
SxW: 162.47
Lateral-D: 0.002
Likes: I like that the QFactor has gone narrower with these cranks than the SLK and I like the lower weight. The finish is nice and the cranks look good on most bikes. One detail I did appreciate was the carbon plug that covers the hollow spindle on the drive arm. Although it's a minor detail it does show that they are focusing on improving their line with each generation. Another plus are the ceramic bearings. As I understand it, the bearings are sourced from Ceramic Speed which is known for high quality ceramics.
Dislikes: Maybe I'm being a bit picky here, but why do ceramic cups have to be red? When spending over $500 on a crankset it seems like one should be afforded a neutral color choice. The only other thing I can find to complain about the set we received is that they are only available in compact and a 53t is not available.
------------------------------
FSA SL-K Light
Claimed Weight: 780grams w/bb
Stock Weight: 766grams w/bb
Corrected Weight: 732grams
Q-factor:150mm
Spindle: 23.66mm
Deflection-D: 0.149
Deflection-ND: 0.278
Average Deflection: 0.21
SxW: 156.28
Lateral-D: 0.005
Likes: The best thing I can say about this crank is that it is stiff. Right on par with DA and Campag. It's a nice looking crank and typically has a price that makes it quite a deal for a carbon crank.
Dislikes: Previous versions of their carbon cranks have been unpredictable. The cranks vary in weight by as much as 40-50 grams per set. Often spiders and rings were not true.(however after sampling a a group of the SL-K Light, that does seem to be vastly improved). Rings also could use some improvement in their shifting quality and a reduction in q-factor would be nice.
-------------------------------
Kcnc Ktype
Claimed Weight: 740grams
Stock Weight: 706grams w/bb
Corrected Weight: 674grams
Q-factor: 145mm
Spindle: 24.02mm
Deflection-D: 0.223
Deflection-ND: 0.407
Average Deflection: 0.31
SxW: 212.31
Lateral-D: 0.017
Likes: Price, this is the least expensive crank we tested. Shift quality is quite high. Stiffness is somewhere in the middle, stiffer than some not as stiff as others. Bearing quality is good and installation is very easy. Definitely the best bargin in terms of 700gram cranks.
Dislikes: The bearing size is not a standard size so finding replacement bearings when the time comes is not as easy as with most of the other cranks. Like on the FSA spiders are often a little out of true(although you can straighten these a bit)
-------------------------------
Lightning SL
Claimed weight: 445grams no rings
Stock Weight: 448grams no rings
Weight: 574grams w/bb
Q-factor:144mm
Spindle: 30.1mm
Deflection-D: 0.260
Deflection-ND: 0.355
Average Deflection: 0.31
SxW: 176.5
Lightning HD
Weight: 592grams w/bb
Q-factor: 144mm
Spindle: 30mm
Deflection-D: 0.264
Deflection-ND: 0.361
Average Deflection: 0.31
SxW: 185
Likes: I had a very early version of this crank several years ago, and while functionally it was great, the carbon work left alot to be desired in the aesthetics. The change in the appearance was the most striking difference to me. This new version is well built with no real visible flaws in the carbon. I also like that they seem to have aimed at a balanced crank. It hits the middle of the field in almost every category. It's light. It's reasonably priced compared to it's carbon competition. It has a narrow q-factor. It's quarq compatible. Like the Extralite crank the Lightning has a bb that is preload adjustable, a big plus in my book. Setup is easy and performance is good. It seems to have almost all the characteristics I think the crank market has been missing, but it does miss the mark in a couple spots.
Dislikes: One thing that I don't like is the lack of a plug on the drive side arm. It seems over time, water, dirt and mud are going to get into the crank arm and may be tough to get out. The recessed pedal insert may cause problems of heal rub for some riders, the fix for that is a spacer which could possibly cause problems with not getting enough contact with the pedal threads. I was going to complain about the graphics, but new ones are already coming which do look better, and the current ones are easily removable. Has a weight limit, a high weight limit but does still carry one. (220lbs SL and 280lbs HD) The only other complaint I have may turn out to not be a complaint at all. The long term road tests by consumers is not there. That does not mean the crank won't hold up over time, simply that it hasn't yet. I do think it has a very promising future as the old one I have is still being used and getting more miles put on it each year.
------------------------------
PMP MicroII
Claimed Weight: 825grams
Stock Weight: 845grams
Corrected Weight: 814grams
Q-factor: 147mm
Spindle: 17.46mm
Deflection-D: 0.204
Deflection-ND: 0.683
Average Deflection: 0.44
SxW:361.01
Lateral-D: 0.014
Likes: It's different. I really like that they went a bit off the beaten path to try something different with this crank. The crank looks nice and all the parts fit together well. The setup is very time consuming though seems to work quite well when done. The chainrings were my favorite part, the machining is great and they function quite well. I like the overall look of the crank as a unit, especially the black one. I also like how the crank arms fit over the outboard cups making for a clean transition.
Dislikes: Stiffness, or lack thereof. This is the least stiff crank we tested as well as also being the heaviest, not a good combination for me. I can't see any reason to use such a small diameter spindle, especially when it's ti. Making that larger could improve the stiffness a bit.
------------------------------
Shimano Dura-Ace
Claimed Weight: 740grams
Stock Weight: 772grams w/bb
Corrected Weight: 732grams
Q-factor: 147mm
Spindle: 23.86mm
Deflection-D: 0.140
Deflection-ND: 0.295
Average Deflection: 0.22
SxW: 159.21
Lateral-D: 0.007
Likes: Stiffness and shift quality. The shift quality of the DA rings is unmatched by any other crank I've ever tried. Installation is easy and quick and generally without problem. While being heavier than most of the lightweights it's very much a bolt and forget kind of crank. In terms of pure performance, this is the current benchmark for others to aim for.
Dislikes: I'd like to see the weight come down a bit. The looks. Like most, I thought this was the ugliest crank when it came out, however now it seems I've desensitized a bit and only find it somewhat offensive. I guess I found some beauty in function.
------------------------------
Sram Red
Claimed Weight: 760grams
Stock Weight: 755grams
Corrected Weight: 741grams
Q-factor: 150mm
Spindle: 23.89mm
Deflection-D: 0.150
Deflection-ND: 0.278
Average Deflection: 0.21
SxW: 158.57
Lateral-D: 0.004
Likes: It's a good looking, reasonably weighted, stiff crank at a good price. The Red crank had the lowest average deflection of all cranks we tested. When you add price into the equation it becomes a very balanced crankset. I'd call this crank the sleeper of the test. It was the one that surprised me the most.
Dislikes: Rings. While the rings shift ok, they could definitely stand for some improvements. I'd also like to see the q-factor reduced by at least a few mm, but preferably more.
Storck Power Arm SL
Claimed weight: 440grams no rings
Stock Weight: 442grams no rings
Weight: 596grams w/bb and DA rings
Corrected Weight: 556grams
Q-factor: 152mm
Spindle: 29.86mm
Deflection-D: 0.193
Deflection-ND: 0.314
Average Deflection: 0.25
SxW: 140.95
Lateral-D: 0.009
Likes: I like that they addressed what I felt were several problems with the Clavicula. The end cap does not crack, the insert does not come loose nor do the bearing races. Other than the spindle material being different the cranks seem virtually the same. Functionally it's a great crank. Stiff and lightweight and a triumph of carbon manufacturing.
Dislikes: The 152mm q-factor and the huge price tag are two to start. One detail that really bothers me is that the end cap has been redesigned from what THM used. In doing this they have created a new standard that is not an allen key nor is it the shimano end cap tool. It is it's own design with it's own tool. However it seems that the tool does not come with the cranks nor is it even available. So you are left to install your cranks with a pin-spanner, screwdriver or some makeshift tool that you come up with on your own. That's not such a big deal until that tool slips and scratches the arms.
-------------------------------
Stronglight Fission Ti
Claimed weight: 795grams
Stock Weight: 754grams w/bb
Corrected Weight: 742grams
Q-factor: 154mm
Spindle: 21.54mm
Deflection-D: 0.195
Deflection-ND: 0.396
Average Deflection: 0.29
SxW: 219.26
Lateral-D: 0.013
Likes: Looks over the Pulsion are greatly improved. The CT2 rings are some of the best rings. I also like that the pedal fitting is reversible to create arms that are either 172.5 or 175. The adjustable fitting also looks like it won't be subject to de-bonding as the Pulsion did. Muted graphics match any bike.
Dislikes: The very small bearings. By keeping the bearing inside the frame they have used an Isis bearing that has questionable durability and is difficult to find as a replacement, a bad combination. For a ti spindled carbon crank, I'd have expected it to be lighter.
--------------------------------
Stronglight X-wing
Claimed Weight: 650
Stock Weight: 737grams
Corrected Weight: 728grams
Q-factor: 146mm
Spindle: 21.58mm
Deflection-D: 0.181
Deflection-ND: 0.379
Average Deflection: 0.28
SxW: 203
Likes: I can't quite put my finger on it, but something about this crank appeals to me. It probably has to do with the shape, aesthetically speaking. I also like the 146/110bcd bolt pattern. This should make for a stiffer ring(both compact and std) which could be an important characteristic when moving to Di2, as well as giving the owners the option of switching back and forth between compact and std without changing cranks. The UD finish is nicely done too.
Dislikes: graphics, especially on the ring, there is just too much writing on the crank/ring. The ugly plastic plugs that cover the multiple chainring bolt sets. I dislike the very thin not easily replaced bb bearings. Wearing out a bearing on a Stronglight crank in the U.S. is not a good thing since the distributor does not usually stock bearings. Standard sized outboard bearings with a larger spindle would be a big improvement in my opinion.
------------------------------
Thm Clavicula
Claimed Weight: 420grams no rings
Stock Weight: 423grams no rings
Weight: 580 w/bb and DA rings.
Corrected Weight: 540grams
Q-factor: 151mm
Spindle: 29.76mm
Deflection-D: 0.169
Deflection-ND: 0.315
Average Deflection: 0.24
SxW: 130.68
Lateral-D: 0.019
Likes: What's not to like about this crank.? Looks, stiffness, weight, SxW, exclusivity etc... It has it all. It's the pinnacle of what carbon constructed cranks can be.
Dislikes: What's not to like about this crank? Ok, so perhaps there are a few things. The huge price, the 151 q-factor, the availability, the durability. The big two for me is the q-factor, they are just a bit too wide for me. But more importantly is the durability. While this is a nicely made crank, the limits are being pushed. While we've never seen catastrophic failures we have seen a few more loose pedal inserts, loose bearing races, and loose thread inserts in the spindle than we'd like to. Also while this is one of the stiffest cranks in the test it is also one of the only cranks to have a rider weight limit.
-------------------------------
Tune Fast Foot + 6 pack ti
Corrected Weight: 687grams w/bb
Q-factor: 154mm
Spindle: 19.31mm
Deflection-D: 0.292
Deflection-ND: 0.488
Average Deflection: 0.39
SxW: 267.93
Lateral-D: 0.004
Likes: The non-tapered bb means arms don't get stuck easily. Also it has a minimalistic clean look to it and is available in a wide range of colors.
Dislikes: The Q-factor is large, 154. The setup is a complete pain in the... and the stiffness is certainly lacking. I'd love to see Tune take a stab at redesigning and improving on a design they have had for quite a long time. I think the arms could be stiffer as could the bb.
-----------------------------
Vista Integral
Weight: 811grams w/bb but adjusted for pedals.
Corrected Weight: 779grams
Q-factor: 160mm
Spindle: 26.58mm
Deflection-D: 0.170
Deflection-ND: 0.322
Average Deflection: 0.25
SxW: 191.63
Lateral-D: 0.006
Likes: I like that this reduces the q-factor vs using the pedals on their own. I like the fact that it changes the way you pedal entirely. The crank is one of the few items that I felt instantly better on as soon as I bolted it up. Stiffness is not bad, not the best, but certainly something to be lived with.
Dislikes: Even though it reduces the q-factor over the std pedal, it still has a wider stance than all the other cranks we tested. 161mm. The lower pedal is also far more likely to hit the ground in corners and the forward position of it increases toe overlap. It could also stand to loose a few grams.
-----------------------------
Zipp Vuma Quad
Claimed Weight: 580grams
Stock Weight:
Corrected Weight: 564grams w/bb
Q-factor: 146mm
Spindle: 29.64mm
Deflection-D: 0.209
Deflection-ND: 0.308
Average Deflection: 0.26
SxW: 145.79
Lateral-D: ? (I didn't have this one recorded)
Likes: Weight, stiffness, q-factor, looks and even the price. While on the upper end of the cost spectrum, it's not much more than Record yet with a big savings in weight and a decent stiffness. Again with muted graphics it matches any bike. It's the closest in SxW to Thm that we've seen and at a better price which also includes rings.
Dislikes: Rings. The rings could certainly use some work on their shifting ramps and pins. That wouldn't be much of a dislike if I could put TA or Stronglight rings on it, but since I can't it becomes much more of an issue to me.
-----------------------------
Here's a couple of pictures of the testing.
---------------------
This one shows just the average deflection of all the cranks. Lower numbers are better.
--------------------
Here's a ranking of the cranks in order of lightest to heaviest as a complete system with corrected weights:
--------------------
This one shows SxW. Again lower would be better.
So that's it in a nutshell. Some facts, some opinions and some pictures.
